Welcome to our blog. We wanted to create a blog for our patients and the general community, to answer some of your questions regarding skin care and skin health. With the vastness of the Internet, it is often difficult to know who to listen to, and where to get honest advice. If you are one of our patients then you know we are straight shooters, who give honest and trustworthy advice. If you are not one of our patients, just ask anyone in the South bay, and they will tell you who we are.
A wise man once said "if you love what you do, you will never work a day in your life". That is how we feel about the field of Dermatology. We have devoted our lives to fighting skin disease and promoting skin health. If this blog helps even one person, well, that would put a smile on our faces.

Sincerely,
Dr. David Horowitz
Dr. Mark Horowitz

P.S.
Did you put your sunscreen on today?

Monday, May 3, 2010

High Doses Of Vitamin D During Pregnancy May Reduce Risk Of Comorbidities

CNN /Health.com (5/1, Mann) reported that, according to research presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting, "pregnant women could -- and probably should -- consume 10 times more vitamin D than experts currently recommend." While "current guidelines for daily vitamin D intake during pregnancy range from 200 international units (IU) per day to 400 IU, the amount found in most prenatal vitamins," researchers now suggest that "women who took 4,000 IU were least likely to go into labor early, give birth prematurely, or develop infections."

Researchers "enrolled 494 pregnant women in a randomized trial of three daily doses of the vitamin -- 400, 2,000, and 4,000 IU a day until delivery," MedPage Today (5/1, Smith) reported. The investigators found that those "getting the highest of three daily doses of vitamin D had half the risk of co-morbidities as those in the control group." As a result, "the take-home message is that pregnant women should take 4,000 International Units a day, according to Carol Wagner, MD, of the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston." The UK's Telegraph (5/1, Smith) also covered the story.